Paul, your article is well written despite the fact that is doesn't contain a shred of truth. You still believe that Trump is in bed with the Russians in spite of the fact that Congressional Democrats hired Robert Mueller at a cost of $33MM to prove that there wasn't any connection between the Trump organization and Russia. In fact, the infamous Steele Dossier was paid for by the Hillary Clinton for President campaign. It was a total fabrication.
You said that the democrats keep their agenda "between the constitutional rails". Is that why SCOTUS shot down many of Joe Biden's actions including the forgiveness of student loans? ... a decision that Biden ignored and forgave the loans anyway. Is that what you mean by "keeping it between constitutional rails"? You claim that the Trump administration is taking actions that are unconstitutional, but you never give a single example to support your claim.
Trump didn't end Birthright Citizenship... he wants to and probably should. The amendment was specifically designed to guarantee citizenship to the children of slaves brought to the US during the time of legal slavery. It was never intended to allow anyone to step foot on US soil and have a baby that can be called a citizen. I will refer to the SCOTUS decision that this amendment does not include the children of foreign diplomats living in the United States.
You said that if you believe voting for Donald Trump makes you a better Christian, you are mistaken and "every major church agrees with this". Wrong again. I attend one of the largest Christian churches in the United States whose pastor is friends with Donald Trump and from which one of Trump's cabinet heads was selected. But, you are correct that voting for Donald Trump does NOT make one a better Christian... it simply makes them a patriot.
But, your biggest lie in this post was when you said this: "You voted to impose higher prices on everyone. Your grocery bill, insurance, gas, medical bills, airline tickets, etc. are proof that you have been played and because you did not do your due diligence, everyone suffers". Your memory must be suffering because all of what you cited above happened during the Biden Administration. During Donald Trump's first term, unemployment was as record LOWS and inflation never got above 3%. Since Trump has taken office, grocery prices, energy prices, and inflation have already begun to come down.
Again, I will give you credit for a pretty good writing style, but you are sorely mistaken on the facts.
I do appreciate the kind words and thank you. I will though issue you the same challenge as I do to all that disagree and wish to discuss the matter. I provide my sources so I will honor debate where you can provide credible sources. Let's begin with your opening claim... "Paul, your article is well written despite the fact that it (sic) doesn't contain a shred of truth."
I won't debate your comments here until you can provide support for your claims and of course, context.
You may define truth as you wish but please know that my personal definition and standards when writing goes like the following: Truth = all known facts related objectively and in context."
The last sentence in the essay that you are challenging says the following: "I would love to hear rebuttal from anyone, so long as you can credibly source your opinions." Please honor this request.
Paul, your article is well written despite the fact that is doesn't contain a shred of truth. You still believe that Trump is in bed with the Russians in spite of the fact that Congressional Democrats hired Robert Mueller at a cost of $33MM to prove that there wasn't any connection between the Trump organization and Russia. In fact, the infamous Steele Dossier was paid for by the Hillary Clinton for President campaign. It was a total fabrication.
You said that the democrats keep their agenda "between the constitutional rails". Is that why SCOTUS shot down many of Joe Biden's actions including the forgiveness of student loans? ... a decision that Biden ignored and forgave the loans anyway. Is that what you mean by "keeping it between constitutional rails"? You claim that the Trump administration is taking actions that are unconstitutional, but you never give a single example to support your claim.
Trump didn't end Birthright Citizenship... he wants to and probably should. The amendment was specifically designed to guarantee citizenship to the children of slaves brought to the US during the time of legal slavery. It was never intended to allow anyone to step foot on US soil and have a baby that can be called a citizen. I will refer to the SCOTUS decision that this amendment does not include the children of foreign diplomats living in the United States.
You said that if you believe voting for Donald Trump makes you a better Christian, you are mistaken and "every major church agrees with this". Wrong again. I attend one of the largest Christian churches in the United States whose pastor is friends with Donald Trump and from which one of Trump's cabinet heads was selected. But, you are correct that voting for Donald Trump does NOT make one a better Christian... it simply makes them a patriot.
But, your biggest lie in this post was when you said this: "You voted to impose higher prices on everyone. Your grocery bill, insurance, gas, medical bills, airline tickets, etc. are proof that you have been played and because you did not do your due diligence, everyone suffers". Your memory must be suffering because all of what you cited above happened during the Biden Administration. During Donald Trump's first term, unemployment was as record LOWS and inflation never got above 3%. Since Trump has taken office, grocery prices, energy prices, and inflation have already begun to come down.
Again, I will give you credit for a pretty good writing style, but you are sorely mistaken on the facts.
Well Barry,
I do appreciate the kind words and thank you. I will though issue you the same challenge as I do to all that disagree and wish to discuss the matter. I provide my sources so I will honor debate where you can provide credible sources. Let's begin with your opening claim... "Paul, your article is well written despite the fact that it (sic) doesn't contain a shred of truth."
I won't debate your comments here until you can provide support for your claims and of course, context.
You may define truth as you wish but please know that my personal definition and standards when writing goes like the following: Truth = all known facts related objectively and in context."
The last sentence in the essay that you are challenging says the following: "I would love to hear rebuttal from anyone, so long as you can credibly source your opinions." Please honor this request.
The ball is in your court.
Thank you again for commenting.