At least you show consistency in using radical, left-wing Progressive scandal rags of questionable veracity in trying to advance your arguments, specious as they are.
Per Media Matters/Fact Check: The Nation utilizes "strong loaded words ... publish[es] misleading reports, and omit[s] information that may damage liberal causes." It also r…
At least you show consistency in using radical, left-wing Progressive scandal rags of questionable veracity in trying to advance your arguments, specious as they are.
Per Media Matters/Fact Check: The Nation utilizes "strong loaded words ... publish[es] misleading reports, and omit[s] information that may damage liberal causes." It also relies on sources that Media Matters classifies as "untrustworthy." Hardly a description of a credible news source.
I agree regarding that the source is far less, than part of a reliable nail to hang one’s hat on.
On a related issue and since you have rarely agreed when I support my claims with sources highly rated by, media bias fact check, that you are now concurring with their analysis for my sourcing?
At least you show consistency in using radical, left-wing Progressive scandal rags of questionable veracity in trying to advance your arguments, specious as they are.
Per Media Matters/Fact Check: The Nation utilizes "strong loaded words ... publish[es] misleading reports, and omit[s] information that may damage liberal causes." It also relies on sources that Media Matters classifies as "untrustworthy." Hardly a description of a credible news source.
I agree regarding that the source is far less, than part of a reliable nail to hang one’s hat on.
On a related issue and since you have rarely agreed when I support my claims with sources highly rated by, media bias fact check, that you are now concurring with their analysis for my sourcing?